Despite The Lies, Primate Ayodele Continues To Prove Critics Wrong

In the ever-evolving landscape of faith, leadership, and public scrutiny, one name that has consistently sparked both admiration and controversy is Primate Elijah Ayodele, the spiritual leader of INRI Evangelical Spiritual Church. Renowned for his prolific prophetic declarations, many of which have captured national and international attention, Primate Ayodele remains a major voice in the realm of spiritual direction.

However, like many prophetic figures before him, his ministry has not escaped criticism, particularly from those who point to prophecies they claim have not been fulfilled.

‎As a journalist who has closely monitored Primate Ayodele’s ministry and prophecies over the years, it is essential to offer a balanced perspective and respond to these criticisms, not in defense of a man, but in defense of truth and context.

‎Unfortunately, critics who isolate a handful of “unfulfilled” prophecies without understanding their conditional nature often make judgments that lack both spiritual insight and intellectual fairness.

‎Primate Ayodele remains unbothered by public criticism and negative commentary surrounding his prophetic ministry.

Despite frequent attacks and attempts to undermine his credibility, he stays rooted in his divine assignment.

Rather than seek public approval or respond to every opinion, Primate Ayodele continues to deliver prophetic messages with boldness and clarity. His focus is not on popularity or applause, but on fulfilling the spiritual responsibility entrusted to him. Even when his prophecies spark controversy or disbelief, he remains steadfast, knowing that the calling of a prophet is not to please men but to speak the truth as revealed by God.

‎Much of the criticism directed at Primate Ayodele stems from a misunderstanding or deliberate misinterpretation of his prophetic statements. One such example is that Primate Ayodele foresaw that former INEC Chairman, Prof. Attahiru Jega, would fail to deliver credible elections in Nigeria. In his words, “Jega will disappoint Nigerians… He does not have a solution to election rigging in Nigeria.”

However, following the 2015 general elections, the reality of widespread irregularities, underage voting, ballot box snatching, and result manipulation quickly confirmed Primate Ayodele’s warning.

What was expected to be a clean break from Nigeria’s electoral failures turned into one of the most controversial elections in recent history, with citizens across the country expressing outrage and disappointment over the process calling it the worst election witnessed in the country.

There where claims also that Primate Ayodele failed on his prophecy that corruption would fight back under Buhari’s government. This were his words: “corruption would fight back under President Muhammadu Buhari.” However, events during and after his tenure have clearly validated the prophecy. In 2021, the EFCC exposed how several ministries, departments, and agencies had padded the national budget with inflated figures, yet none were held accountable. Instead of being uprooted, corruption embedded itself deeper within the system. The anti-corruption campaign that once inspired public confidence became compromised, as powerful figures within the administration manipulated the very institutions meant to ensure transparency and accountability.
‎
‎After Buhari left office, the scale of corruption within his government became even more evident. Former CBN Governor Godwin Emefiele was arrested and is still facing multiple corruption charges. Others like ex-Attorney General Abubakar Malami, former Aviation Minister Hadi Sirika, and ex-Minister of Humanitarian Affairs Sadiya Umar Farouq were all linked to serious financial scandals.

These developments confirm Primate Ayodele’s prophecy in clear terms, corruption did not just resist Buhari’s efforts; it thrived.

Critics who once doubted the prophecy failed to grasp its depth, focusing on political rhetoric instead of the unfolding realities.
Again, ‎it was mentioned that the Man of God prophesied that former President Goodluck Jonathan would remain in power until 2019.

However, a closer look at his January 18, 2015 interview reveals a different message entirely. Primate Ayodele clearly stated that Jonathan would be the last PDP president, and that he foresaw a new government coming up in the country.

This were his words, “Nigerian politics still needs a lot of prayers. We need to be prayerful to avert many politicians from getting involved in accidents. The election will not break up Nigeria, there will be partial peace in some places, while there will be no peace in others. I don’t see Nigeria remaining a single nation in the next 30 years. Jonathan will be the last PDP president. I see a new government coming up in this country. If Jonathan eventually wins in 2015, the PDP will not have it in 2019. The party will break.” He never claimed Jonathan would win the 2015 election; instead, he issued a conditional warning that if Jonathan did win, PDP would be doomed by 2019.

Highlighting internal
fractures that eventually led to the party’s collapse on the national stage with party members currently decamping to the ruling party and other political parties also governor’sdevamping.

His words were more of a spiritual political analysis than a partisan endorsement, and history has since validated his foresight.
‎
‎Critics who isolate segments of his statements without acknowledging the full context are not only being disingenuous but are also ignoring the broader accuracy of his revelations.

To those who criticize without proper research, without investigating the contexts of his messages, or without understanding prophetic language, my humble advice is: do better. Be responsible in your critique. Instead of scoffing from the sidelines, engage the message. Understand the symbolisms. Study the patterns. Or better still, offer your own spiritual contribution to the nation and the world. It’s far easier to mock a man on the frontline than to stand in his shoes.
‎
‎More importantly, critics should ask themselves: What do I gain by discrediting someone who is actively warning, guiding, and serving? If Primate Ayodele’s prophecies bring attention to avoidable disasters and stir action that prevents loss, is that not a win for humanity?